I set up 2 synchronizaton jobs and set the "synchronise periodically" option to 15 minutes and minimized synkron to the system tray.Īfter 15 minutes, the jobs seemed to start fine, but now (more than 3 hours later) synchronization seems to be stalled, Time specified in "synchronise periodically". I think this might be caused by the fact that the initial synchronization process takes longer to finish than the When a log of files need to be synchronized. Issue: when "synchronize periodically" is enabled the synchronization process doesn't complete This way programs can finish their write actions before the synchronization starts (preventing corrupt files etc) Seconds/minutes should pass without any changes before the synchronization starts. To wait before actually starting the synchronization after a change was detected or even better how many That is, when it was able to detect file system changes and synchronize as soon as changes are detected.Īdditionally it would be very nice to have an extra option where you can specify how many seconds/minutes ![]() Synkron would be the killer app in my opinion if it could synchronize in realtime. Feature request: add possibility to synchronize in real time. (either when minimizing the window and/or when clicking the close button)ĭouble clicking the system tray icon would then restore the main window Without having to right click the system tray icon and choosing "hide" each time ![]() * Related to this it would also be nice to have an option to minimize synkron to the system tray > Start synkron with the option "run hidden" activated so that it start minimized. The system tray icon has the option "hide" enabled initially instead of "show"Īfter clicking the "hide" option, it's possible to select "show" to open the main window. Minor issue: When "run hidden" is activated and sykron is started, This seems a simple, yet very complete and intuitive application. Multiple-CPU processing is good, especially on the first 8-core Mac Pro (despite the power consumption).ġ0.5 -> Mac Pro 2009 - Slow and bloated by the new features.ġ0.4 -> iMac 17" iSight and Mac Pro 2007 - Stable and fast despite on 7200-rpm drive.I'm looking for a good synchronization program wich runs cross platform (linux and windows), has a nice graphical interface, has a restore functionality, etcĪnd I think I finally found it: Synkron ! Sluggished graphics when all 8 cores are maxed out. Problem alleviated with 10.5.7 update.ġ0.6 -> Mac Pro 2009 and MBP 15" 2010 - The epitome of Mac OS X after they got rid of support for PowerPC-based hardware. Runs even faster on SSD with my MBP.ġ0.7 -> MBP 15" 2010 with SSD - Hell all over. ![]() Graphics memory leakage even until the latest iteration of 10.8.2. Takes a whole lot more RAM even on basic tasks. Buggy as hell.ġ0.8 -> MBP 15" 2010 with SSD - Better and faster than Lion, but still overall slower compared to SL, and graphics memory leakage still persistent. Graphics is faster, but the cost of memory leakage, I need to constantly reset VRAM by flip-flopping GPU once in a while, which is tedious. Well, ML has more eye candy and I just got a 2012 quad-core Mac Mini a few months ago and it feels like lightning so perhaps it was my imagination? I just upgraded my 2008 Macbook Pro (the one with the notorious NVidia 8600M GT that I've had no trouble with here) to Mountain Lion last night and after getting everything reorganized and updated (rid/replaced PPC stuff, etc.), it just seemed like the interface felt slower. I realize XBench is ancient but it's still running the same tests between OS versions and identical OS machines to give a reasonable estimate of differences over several passes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |